Why Unesco?

Some countries are in an effort to figure out their identities in different ways with expectation to officially possess those in one day. In the meantime, some try to label their cultures to become world heritage status by engaged with UNESCO: 1972 convention and 2003 convention, due to the identity, preservation and socio-economic purpose.

#AngkorWat

A post shared by Ou Kongkea (@oukongkea) on

With 1972 convention, the balance of preservation and development was pointed out in multi-articles to basically consider the issue in World Heritage Site. On the one hand, #Urbanicide is truly concerned by some scholars on critical heritage studies. Meanwhile, 2003 convention seems standstill when the state party is proud of the #UNESCO label in a short time without detailing long-term policy. So what is necessary of identity? In the future, we will hear the presenter states that country A owns it [by embalming], while country B regularly practices it.

Conical hat #ASEANHat

A post shared by Ou Kongkea (@oukongkea) on

In sum, people should have been happy with culture in which they have developed, and also live with what they suppose to.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s